I wonder why some folk write to encourage using violence to address some political crises?
Let us say, OK we will use that violence to solve our political problems and then engage in this violence to cause different killings. How could such acts be progressive acts for resettlement?
I read to someone who encourages using violence to solve the political problems in Sudan in one of Reuters posts about the last clashes in Sudan.
That voice says, "think sudan is now entering a new era where the different ethnicities question their position with in the state and their share of power and resources.
The only way possible they can narrow down the difference and marginalization is through the use of force. I think the recent violence is a clear manifestation of this. this has shown a turning point for the different factions fighting amongst themselves in remote places, how to direct their forces to challenge the ruling elite. And clearly the government has started to feel the heat."
I have replied to that call by the following:
Use of force is the cause of many disasters in Sudan. If this action helps, we do not have to have the longest civil war in Africa. However, unless the force is used by a united Sudanese revolution there is no way for tribal forces to get democracy. I have no wonder about the regional and international conspiracy against Sudan to devastate this united 1 million squire miles land.
The real problem of the civil dictatorship and the military dictatorship we have in our luck store since independence from Britain is that, the Sudanese people work separately in so many different groups but not one. Let them achieve unity in the revolutionary struggle first to assure that we will have unity in the country in the future.
I hate to see discriminating and bad intentions in this moderate discussion. Please be wise when you publish any input.
More at Darfur Rebels| Darfur Crisis| Fur| Afrojournal Blog.
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Why Darfur intervention is a mistake
Might it work, or might we find ourselves with an open-ended commitment to policing a violent and divided region of the world, part of the problem and not the solution?
More at Darfur Rebels| Darfur Crisis| Fur|
read more digg story
More at Darfur Rebels| Darfur Crisis| Fur|
read more digg story
Monday, May 12, 2008
When Ignorance Becomes a Pleasure
When ignorance becomes a pleasure, some people need to learn how to make their Words Sell!
Fran Healy, lead singer of the British pop group Travis, visited Darfur on behalf of Save the Children, and then said to the media, "Africa is a very complex place, but the Darfur crisis is quite simple. The conflict is essentially the Arabs against the African. It is all tied up in various battles over things like oil and gold."
It seems that the pop singer has no political knowledge or he is biased against the Arabs! However, I have no more wonders since lot of media sources are biased nowadays.
The statement about Darfur is definitely wrong! I know the ins and outs of the misery. Following the media totally is leading to misunderstanding and to a chaos! The problem is well known as an insufficient distribution to the development in Sudan.
It falls in this area of what we call the trouble of the marginal regions. There are other regions in Sudan, which share the same fate. In addition, the singer may even have not noticed that the Furs have Arabic and Islamic names!
Some of the people who are seeking refuge in Europe and even those who are not Fur claimed that they are fur escaping the crises to gain refugees status and live in the British paradise, or elsewhere in the west. We know this and we know some of them have been accepted there! Oh, my…
Those so called Janjaweed are created and supported both by what we call the military dictatorship and the civil dictatorship which depends on the mechanical majority dictatorship. This is our fate to share in all our regions and to struggle against the odds.
Such statement leads to discrimination, we hope the international media will avoid. More politics at Darfur Rebels| Darfur Crisis| Fur|
Are you a singer or a poet? Stand for peace! Here too --> http://www.cafepress.com/nadiana and build your success at MYWS
Fran Healy, lead singer of the British pop group Travis, visited Darfur on behalf of Save the Children, and then said to the media, "Africa is a very complex place, but the Darfur crisis is quite simple. The conflict is essentially the Arabs against the African. It is all tied up in various battles over things like oil and gold."
It seems that the pop singer has no political knowledge or he is biased against the Arabs! However, I have no more wonders since lot of media sources are biased nowadays.
The statement about Darfur is definitely wrong! I know the ins and outs of the misery. Following the media totally is leading to misunderstanding and to a chaos! The problem is well known as an insufficient distribution to the development in Sudan.
It falls in this area of what we call the trouble of the marginal regions. There are other regions in Sudan, which share the same fate. In addition, the singer may even have not noticed that the Furs have Arabic and Islamic names!
Some of the people who are seeking refuge in Europe and even those who are not Fur claimed that they are fur escaping the crises to gain refugees status and live in the British paradise, or elsewhere in the west. We know this and we know some of them have been accepted there! Oh, my…
Those so called Janjaweed are created and supported both by what we call the military dictatorship and the civil dictatorship which depends on the mechanical majority dictatorship. This is our fate to share in all our regions and to struggle against the odds.
Such statement leads to discrimination, we hope the international media will avoid. More politics at Darfur Rebels| Darfur Crisis| Fur|
Are you a singer or a poet? Stand for peace! Here too --> http://www.cafepress.com/nadiana and build your success at MYWS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
